Senate committee votes to repeal Iraq war authorizations
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday voted to repeal two Iraq-related war authorizations, Congress’ latest move to curtail presidential war powers.
The panel voted 14-8 on a Sens bill. Tim kaineTimothy (Tim) Michael Kaine Senate Democrats Consider Government Funding Bill Without Increasing Debt Democrats Scramble For Strategy To Avoid Default Five Takeaways From Senate Hearing On Afghanistan MORE (D-Va.) And Todd YoungTodd Christopher YoungHow to Fix Semiconductor Chip Shortage (It’s More Than Manufacturing) Senate Democrats attempt to defuse GOP budget drama The 19 GOP Senators who voted for the GOP Bill T PLUS infrastructure (R-Ind.) Which would repeal the 2002 authorization for the use of military force (AUMF) which gave the green light to the war in Iraq. The bill would also repeal the 1991 AUMF which approved the Gulf War.
In addition to Young, GOP Sens. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulHouse passes bill to end crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity GOP political operatives charged with illegal contribution of Russian national to campaign in 2016 (Ky.) And Rob portmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanHillicon Valley – Brought to you by Ericsson – Bill would give some groups 24 hours to report ransomware payments (Ohio) voted with the Democrats to support the bill.
“The two AUMF supporting military action to counter the malicious activities of an Iraq ruled by Saddam Hussein were rendered useless more than ten years ago when it was toppled and executed and a new Iraqi government was put in place. constituted, “Kaine said Wednesday.
“Congresses on both sides abdicated our responsibility for the power to declare war and allowed the presidents of both sides to act unilaterally,” Kaine added. “Action by Congress to repeal these permissions will be a step towards taking Congress seriously of its most solemn responsibility. “
Momentum was built to repeal decades-old authorizations for war President BidenJoe Biden’s Vaccination Rise Includes Biggest Republican Gain Since April: Gallup Power grab? The Federal Reserve may soon be our only Ford bank asking salaried workers for PLUS vaccine status launched airstrikes against Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria in February and June. Biden cited his authorities under Article II of the Constitution, not an AUMF, to lead the strikes, but the action has always spurred Congressional efforts to restrict existing war permits.
Majority leader in the Senate Charles SchumerChuck SchumerPelosi invokes climate conference to push spending No. 2 Senate Democrat: Raise debt ceiling as part of reconciliation, a “non-starter” (DN.Y.) reiterated Wednesday that he plans to repeal the 2002 AUMF in the Senate for a vote later this year.
In June, the House voted to repeal the 2002 and 1991 AUMFs, as well as a 1957 resolution that granted broad authorization for military action in the Middle East to protect against “armed aggression from any controlled country. by international communism ”.
The action of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations comes Wednesday the day after a hearing with Assistant Secretary of State Wendy Sherman and senior lawyers from the State Department and the Pentagon, during which they affirmed the support of administration upon repeal of the 2002 measure.
“The Biden-Harris administration believes that the 2002 authorization for the use of military force against Iraq has exceeded its usefulness and should be repealed,” Sherman told senators.
“For the State Department, the repeal of the 2002 AUMF would not affect our diplomatic initiatives, and the administration has made it clear that we have no ongoing military activity that relies solely on the AUMF to 2002 ”, she added.
The main authority cited in US counterterrorism operations is the 2001 AUMF adopted after the September 11 attacks. Officials in the Biden administration also argue they have sufficient Article II authority to respond to any threats to U.S. personnel and interests.
Yet most Republicans have argued that the 2002 repeal of the AUMF could cripple US counterterrorism missions and embolden Iran-backed militias that target US forces in Iraq.
At Wednesday’s meeting, the top Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, the senator. Jim rischJim Elroy RischOvernight Defense & National Security – Brought to you by Gen. AM – Pentagon officials prepare to grill Republican lawmakers warn of greater military coordination with Russia Biden avoids GOP on court recess, for now MORE (Idaho), acknowledged that removing the 2002 AUMF from the books would not prevent a president from taking military action, but argued that repealing it would be a bad “message.”
“I will be the first to admit that whether 2002 exists or not, whether it is repealed or not, it will have no effect on the decision of a CEO, either this one or the other. , to act that the CEO thinks needs to be taken, “said Risch.” I frankly conclude that there is simply no reason to repeal it at this time, as it endangers in any way it is sending a message that we are committed to the region and determined to protect our troops and American interests. “
GOP Meaning. Ted cruzRafael (Ted) Edward Cruz McConnell Blocks Schumer’s Attempt to Bypass Filibuster on Increasing Debt Schumer: Raising Debt Limit Through Budget Reconciliation “non-starter” Cruz says GOP will prevent Schumer to circumvent filibuster when increasing debt PLUS (Texas) and Bill Hagerty (Tenn.) On Wednesday proposed amendments they said would preserve the president’s options for responding to threats from Iran and Iranian-backed militias.
Cruz’s amendment failed 9-13 and Hagerty’s failed 7-15, with Democrats claiming they would have been a backdoor authorization for military action against Iran.
Those who support the decision to repeal the 2002 and 1991 measures hope that this will be a first step in a broader effort to reform war powers, including replacing the 2001 AUMF with a more authorization. narrow.
But past efforts to replace the 2002 AUMF have been hampered by partisan disagreements and clashes between the legislative and executive branches over whether to include limits on the types of forces that can be used, countries and forces. terrorist groups who are covered and how long the authorization lasts.
Wednesday, the senator Ben cardinBenjamin (Ben) Louis Cardin Lawmakers Say Innovation and Business Rules Key to Small Business Gains MORE (D-Md.) Expressed concern about similar fighting to come, saying he expects the state and defense departments to ask for a “blank check.”
“I think the Biden administration is sincere in working with us on a realistic clearance, and I trust President Biden understands what he needs to keep America safe in our fight against terrorist groups in the Middle East, ”Cardin said. “I think we’re going to have an extremely difficult time with defense and state attorneys as we seek to replace the 2001 authorization.”